May 1, 2026
A job cost report is a financial document that shows the revenue, direct costs, and gross margin for a specific restoration job — breaking down costs by category (labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors) and comparing actual costs to the original estimate. It is the primary tool for measuring whether individual jobs are performing at target margin.
The P&L shows you what happened to the company. The job cost report shows you why. Company-level financials tell you that gross margin was 42% last quarter. The job cost report tells you that water mitigation jobs ran 51%, reconstruction ran 34%, the commercial property management account runs 28%, and that Jobs 2247 and 2251 lost money. Without job-level data, you’re managing outcomes without understanding causes.
Header: Job number, job type, customer/carrier, start and close date, assigned PM. Revenue section: Estimated revenue (original scope), approved revenue (after adjuster review), and variance. Positive variance = supplement success. Negative variance = scope was rejected or reduced. Direct costs: Labor (budgeted vs. actual hours/cost), materials (budgeted vs. actual), equipment (days deployed vs. estimated), and subcontractors (budgeted vs. actual invoices). Gross margin section: Gross profit dollars, gross margin percentage, target margin for this job type, and variance from target.
Jobs below target margin: Flag every job below target. Review largest variances first. Patterns by job type: Are water mitigation jobs consistently hitting target? Patterns reveal systematic estimating problems, not random variation. Patterns by PM: If jobs managed by a specific PM consistently run over on labor, that’s a performance management conversation. Patterns by customer/carrier: If a specific TPA consistently produces below-target margins, you have a structural pricing problem that no execution improvement will fix. Equipment utilization: Equipment that stays on a job longer than estimated may indicate a supplement opportunity or a protocol issue.
Monthly at minimum — reviewing all jobs closed in the previous month. High-volume companies or companies with identified margin problems should review weekly. The data is only useful if it’s reviewed while the lessons are still applicable.
Well-executed residential water mitigation typically runs 55–70% gross margin. Below 45% indicates a pricing or cost control problem. Commercial mitigation margins vary by account but should generally run 45–60%.
Yes — with appropriate context. Job-level cost data is valuable input for PM and estimator performance reviews because it connects individual decisions to financial outcomes. It should be combined with qualitative assessment of customer satisfaction and team management, not used as a sole performance metric.
QuickBooks (with job costing properly configured), Sage 100 Contractor, Jonas Construction Software, and industry-specific platforms like Dash are common. The platform matters less than proper job cost code application to every transaction.
Mike McCabe is The Profit Detective — a 36-year restoration industry veteran. Job cost analysis is the foundation of every Profit Detective diagnostic engagement.
Most engagements pay for themselves within the first week.